Regulatory Gaps in Automated Financial Markets: Algorithms, Systemic Risk and Challenges for Brazilian Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3419Keywords:
Financial regulation, Algorithmic trading, Systemic risk, Automated markets, Regulatory governanceAbstract
The increasing automation of financial markets has transformed the way orders are executed, risks are transmitted and market infrastructures are supervised. In Brazil, the modernization of trading platforms, the growing use of algorithms, electronic market access mechanisms and the sophistication of financial intermediaries make it increasingly relevant to assess whether the existing regulatory framework is sufficient to address technology-driven systemic risks. This article examines regulatory gaps in automated financial markets, with emphasis on the interaction between algorithmic trading, critical infrastructure, non-bank financial intermediation, investor protection and financial stability. The research adopts a qualitative, documentary and legal-regulatory approach, based on the analysis of Brazilian rules, institutional documents, technical standards and specialized literature on algorithmic governance and systemic risk. The article argues that the central problem is not the absolute absence of regulation, but the fragmentation between different normative layers: order execution, supervision of intermediaries, technological security, market infrastructure and macroprudential analysis. It concludes that Brazilian governance of automated markets should move toward a more integrated approach, capable of articulating innovation, market integrity, investor protection and the prevention of systemic risks in a financial environment increasingly dependent on technology.
Downloads
References
B3. LINE 5.0: Line Trading. São Paulo: B3, [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/solucoes/plataformas/gestao-de-risco/line-5/line-trading/. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
B3. Política comercial de serviços de co-location B3. São Paulo: B3, 2026. Disponível em: https://www.b3.com.br/data/files/CC/27/0B/30/EFE0D8103152D4C8AC094EA8/Politica%20Comercial%20Colocation%20-%20Portugues.pdf. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Resolução BCB nº 85, de 8 de abril de 2021. Dispõe sobre a política de segurança cibernética e sobre os requisitos para a contratação de serviços de processamento e armazenamento de dados e de computação em nuvem. Brasília: Banco Central do Brasil, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/exibenormativo?numero=85&tipo=Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+BCB. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Resolução BCB nº 538, de 18 de dezembro de 2025. Altera a Resolução BCB nº 85, de 8 de abril de 2021. Brasília: Banco Central do Brasil, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/exibenormativo?numero=538&tipo=Resolu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+BCB. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS. Quantum computing and the financial system: opportunities and risks. BIS Papers, n. 149. Basel: BIS, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap149.htm. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS. Quantum-readiness for the financial system. BIS Papers, n. 158. Basel: BIS, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap158.pdf. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
BIAIS, Bruno; FOUCAULT, Thierry; MOINAS, Sophie. Equilibrium fast trading. Journal of Financial Economics, v. 116, n. 2, p. 292-313, 2015.
BORIO, Claudio. The financial cycle and macroeconomics: what have we learnt? Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 45, p. 182-198, 2014.
BRUNNERMEIER, Markus K.; PEDERSEN, Lasse Heje. Market liquidity and funding liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, v. 22, n. 6, p. 2201-2238, 2009.
BUDISH, Eric; CRAMTON, Peter; SHIM, John. The high-frequency trading arms race: frequent batch auctions as a market design response. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 130, n. 4, p. 1547-1621, 2015.
COMISSÃO DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS. Resolução CVM nº 35, de 26 de maio de 2021. Estabelece normas e procedimentos a serem observados na intermediação de operações realizadas com valores mobiliários em mercados regulamentados de valores mobiliários. Rio de Janeiro: CVM, 2021. Disponível em: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/resol035.html. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
COMISSÃO DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS. Resolução CVM nº 135, de 10 de junho de 2022. Dispõe sobre o funcionamento dos mercados regulamentados de valores mobiliários; a constituição, organização, funcionamento e extinção das entidades administradoras de mercado organizado. Rio de Janeiro: CVM, 2022a. Disponível em: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/resol135.html. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
COMISSÃO DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS. Resolução CVM nº 175, de 23 de dezembro de 2022. Dispõe sobre a constituição, o funcionamento e a divulgação de informações dos fundos de investimento, bem como sobre a prestação de serviços para os fundos. Rio de Janeiro: CVM, 2022b. Disponível em: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/resol175.html. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD. Global Monitoring Report on Non-Bank Financial Intermediation 2024. Basel: FSB, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.fsb.org/2024/12/global-monitoring-report-on-non-bank-financial-intermediation-2024/. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD. Global Monitoring Report on Nonbank Financial Intermediation 2025. Basel: FSB, 2025a. Disponível em: https://www.fsb.org/2025/12/global-monitoring-report-on-nonbank-financial-intermediation-2025/. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD. Leverage in Nonbank Financial Intermediation: final report. Basel: FSB, 2025b. Disponível em: https://www.fsb.org/2025/07/leverage-in-nonbank-financial-intermediation-final-report/. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
HASBROUCK, Joel; SAAR, Gideon. Low-latency trading. Journal of Financial Markets, v. 16, n. 4, p. 646-679, 2013.
HENDERSHOTT, Terrence; JONES, Charles M.; MENKVELD, Albert J. Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, v. 66, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2011.
MENKVELD, Albert J. High frequency trading and the new market makers. Journal of Financial Markets, v. 16, n. 4, p. 712-740, 2013.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard: FIPS 203. Gaithersburg: NIST, 2024a. Disponível em: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard: FIPS 204. Gaithersburg: NIST, 2024b. Disponível em: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard: FIPS 205. Gaithersburg: NIST, 2024c. Disponível em: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Findings regarding the market events of May 6, 2010. Washington, DC: SEC/CFTC, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.sec.gov/files/marketevents-report.pdf. Acesso em: 26 maio 2026.





































